FMS 2008 is over and now we know everything about the fourth section.
Thankfully, there were no surprises as far as the fourth section is
concerned. But, I think people at FMS like surprises. Probably the
reason, there was lot of ambiguity in FMS paper. How can you stop
wondering at that rectangle question, 10% decrease in both dimensions
or the one where the kid was supposed to divide half of a number by 6
and 4 and he accidently divided it by 5. Come to think of it, errors in
the question paper were just an extension of Admit card fiasco.
click here for FMS 2008 Analysis
Technorati Tags: FMS
Thankfully, there were no surprises as far as the fourth section is
concerned. But, I think people at FMS like surprises. Probably the
reason, there was lot of ambiguity in FMS paper. How can you stop
wondering at that rectangle question, 10% decrease in both dimensions
or the one where the kid was supposed to divide half of a number by 6
and 4 and he accidently divided it by 5. Come to think of it, errors in
the question paper were just an extension of Admit card fiasco.
click here for FMS 2008 Analysis
Technorati Tags: FMS
zafar
January 14, 2008
Rectangle Question took my 2 minutes ..how
can they do such blunders
Anonymous
January 14, 2008
there was a printing error in that rectangle question i suppose.. i should have been decrease by 10% in length and increase by 10 % in breadth, so that the answer would have been overall decrease in 1% :)
rahul
January 14, 2008
Yes, there were printing errors. i think, FMS will nullify these questions. Atleast, I skipped breadth and length question but I couldnt resist 'kid divided the number 5...' question.
Unknown
January 15, 2008
One more error in the Integration question.I did that at least thrice. It was such a cake that i couldn't resist myself to check again and again that why i'm not getting any one of the options. Its difficult to imagine that question paper of such a reputated college was having so many mistakes.